I’ve just spent time reading some of the perspectives on Libraries 2.0 and found several articles interesting. Rick Anderson’s “Away from the icebergs” used a clever image to suggest some changes to library thinking. Collection building for a just in case collection is definitely on the decline. At Cairo American College we have a wonderful HS reference collection – and it is rarely used. There is a continuing shift to electronic resources.
His next point about user education made me gulp – probably because I’m a MS HS librarian who does lots of teaching. Introducing kids to the library, library catalog, databases, and other library resources seems like a no-brainer to me. It sure seems to help kids become more confident finders and users of resources. Perhaps instruction and help services are more important at the MS and HS level than the college level where Rick Anderson works.
And finally, his last point – the come to us model of service. Participating in the 23 Things has certainly given me insights into the concept of taking services to patrons where they are. And I agree it is very necessary. I also come from Vermont where libraries serve important funtions in small towns – places that draw people in, create social spaces, and maintain community. Married to an architect, I’ve come to understand the power of the built environment in enhancing community life – so, I think it’s cool to swarm into this wonderful new web world, but hopefully not totally give up libraries and community in the corporeal world.
The Chip Nilges piece contained a lot of jargon and acronemes. But I got the gist of it. OCLC is doing what it should be doing – and is in the forefront of using web 2.0.
The last article I read was the Stephens piece. That kind of library writing makes me rebelious and annoyed. It is a written harrange, an overwhelming, finger shaking lecture fulls of “shoulds.” I feel insulted. Better just retire and fade into the dusty old book shelf leaving the library world to smarty pants guys like Michael Stephens.